by Kimberly Paxton
Originally published at The Daily Sheeple
Remember the horrible starvation diet version of school lunches that Michelle Obama tried to mandate to help fix the obesity crisis among kids?
Well, the USDA, who is in charge of the federal lunch program, has finally waved the white flag of surrender and given up trying to enforce them.
Back in 2012, The Daily Sheeple reported on the miserly portions served to starving students across the nation:
Michelle Obama championed the federal Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act as part of her Let’s Move campaign. The act has been put into place to combat childhood obesity but it’s leaving a lot of kids…well…HUNGRY.
School lunches have undergone such a drastic transformation that students across the country are complaining of hunger pangs throughout the day. Portion sizes have been reduced, dessert and flavored milks have been banned, and, in the name of financial easing, the prices of these smaller lunches have been increased.
USDA Deputy Undersecretary Janey Thornton blames the kids for the reported hunger pangs. “One thing I think we need to keep in mind as kids say they’re still hungry is that many children aren’t used to eating fruits and vegetables at home, much less at school. So it’s a change in what they are eating. If they are still hungry, it’s that they are not eating all the food that’s being offered.”
The kids are fighting back. Student athletes across the country are complaining that their caloric needs are not being met by the enforced diet. No adjustments are being made based on energy output – the food offerings are the same across the board. Kids report only drinking the milk and throwing out the plates of hummus and black bean salad in revolt, according to a student in South Dakota. Serving sizes are only slightly adjusted by the age of the kids – the new rulebook sets calorie maximums for school lunches — 650 calories for elementary-schoolers, 700 for middle-schoolers and 850 for high-schoolers. (source)
After a two year assault of complaints from parents, school staff, and students, it became clear that the First Lady was “out to lunch” when it came to satisfying hungry schoolchildren. The USDA has finally agreed to relent and let the incongruously named Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (teehee) die. Cafeterias will now increase the “rations” allowed to students, quelling hungry tummies everywhere.
Senator John Hoeven of North Dakota and Senator Mark Pryor of Arkansas announced Friday, that the U.S. Department of Agriculture had agreed to loosen those requirements to the National School Lunch and Breakfast Program.
“Today, the USDA made the permanent changes we have been seeking to the School Lunch Program,” Hoeven said. “A one-size-fits-all approach to school lunch left students hungry and school districts frustrated with the additional expense, paperwork and nutritional research necessary to meet federal requirements. These are exactly the changes included in our Sensible School Lunch Act.”
“After hearing from educators, parents, and students, Senator Hoeven and I stepped in to help school districts who were frustrated with the National School Lunch and Breakfast Program’s strict new rules,” Pryor said. “I’m glad the USDA followed our lead and made these much-needed administrative changes that will give our school districts the permanent flexibility they need to keep our kids healthy and successful.”Susan Ellinger, a school nutrition supervisor in Staunton, VA said the reversal will mean fuller stomachs, and therefore “fewer attendance problems, fewer nurse visits, increased test scores and increased attention.” (source)
Some people suggested that parents just send lunches if they weren’t happy with what the school was providing. However, in a country where the Department of Health and Human Services has been known to inspect children’s lunchboxes, since we as parents clearly have no idea what our kids should eat, it is a little more difficult. In some schools, where the lunchroom supervisors also seem to serve as enforcers, supplementing kids’ lunches according to ridiculous guidelines, and in others, where you aren’t even allowed to send a lunch unless you have a doctor’s note, it just isn’t that easy to resist the First Lady’s attempt to nutritionally dictate and attempt to churn out a bunch of trim little students.
For now, at least, starving students will be a little less hungry.
I’m surprised they gave up so easily. I would have expected the feds to try and come up with a “green” solution, like demanding the kids to meet their energy needs through solar power or something.
It’s just more of the 1938 Germany Police State. It will be a cold day in hell when we stop homeschooling our children. Even more critical than Government schools starving our children for food, is them starving our children from truth and morality. As parents, WE are responsible for teaching our children (Deuteronomy 6:7). Bow only to God, not to government.
Home schooling, an idea whose time has come.
Well, Moochelle is all done with school lunches now, Hawaii is calling. Seriously, she’s moved on. The mid term elections are coming up and she needs to make sure that the minions vote Dumocrat.
I hope that this is a reminder to all parents-get out of the “public” schools. Nothing good happens there.
Well said!
I know a women who works in a Public School Café. She is actually the head lunch lady. Her and her husband are both vegan and she says it pains her to have to give kids the food they school provides. She says its utterly sickening but that’s what they have. Even with these new “better” choices forced on schools by Obama’s the food is still gross. She said she even has to put a scoop of the fruit(peaches/pears) on the kids plate even if they say “I don’t want those.” Even if they are just going to toss it in the trash at the end of the line she still HAS to put it on their plate. What a wasteful country we live in. This “better” food program is doing nothing but creating more cost to our already strapped Gov.
Instead of engaging in the impotent act of merely complaining and then taking no effective action, I sent my child to a private Christian school, starting in kinder garden. I am in the 13th year of making school lunches, so I know what he is eating at school, you know gross things like organic food, and purified tap water. As a result:
The state school system loses one child to indoctrinate, and the funds to do so. Parents can take effective action, don’t submit your children to the system, and it will collapse do to defunding. Don’t let the Godless, faceless bureaucrats starve your children physically, morally, and spiritually,starve the system to death, by withdrawing from it.
I have helped out in my kid’s public elementary school cafeteria and I don’t find this information to be in keeping with what is practiced.
Children at our school have a choice of plain or chocolate milk, whether they pack or buy.
Children who get a hot lunch, have a choice of at least two (admittedly unappetizing to me) entree choices, plus they have unlimited salad bar and fresh fruit, at will. Not enforced.
This does not seem draconian, or like rationing, or a police state. There is no lunchbox monitoring going on. Perhaps schools have a choice of what to offer students, and some people were making unfortunate decisions. It seems to me that parents at those particular schools should work with school officials to find a workable solution.
But making blanket statements about a system you don’t know anything about, based on anonymous allegations in specious articles is irresponsible, and “Dum.” (minion stealth)
This is idiotic. The only part of the school lunches that were portion controlled were the fattening items. Students were allowed to have as much fruit and vegetables as they liked. The real problem is that parents don’t teach their kids to eat these items at home. If you want your kid to have pizza and strawberry milk for lunch, pack it yourself. The average school lunch is about the unhealthiest load of garbage I can think of, next to McDonald’s. This site should be ashamed of itself for publishing false reports, while pretending offer insight into a healthy lifestyle.